We speak to bid teams on a weekly basis. Here are our 100+ staffing & recruitment bid evaluations insights:
Mistake 1: Fragmented communications costing bids
Problem:
Important bid details, candidate availability, pricing updates, or compliance notes,end up scattered across Teams chats, Slack messages, emails, and shared drives.
One bid manager shared: “Our recruiters and sales teams share critical candidate data through messaging apps. Formal tracking is an afterthought.
Consequence:
Lost information, misaligned proposals, and costly mistakes due to overlooked details.
Fix:
Centralize communications in one dedicated platform to eliminate confusion, reduce errors, and keep everyone informed.
Mistake 2: Manual candidate and pricing data entry
Problem:
Bid teams repeatedly copy candidate profiles, hourly rates, compliance documentation, and client requirements manually into multiple spreadsheets.
A bid coordinator said: “Merging candidate submissions, pricing info, and compliance documents manually creates constant version issues and errors.”
Consequence:
Costly mistakes in candidate pricing, compliance breaches, lost productivity, and increased risk of losing competitive bids.
Fix:
Adopt standardized digital submission templates for internal teams and suppliers, reducing manual effort and improving accuracy.
Mistake 3: Poor visibility of bid progress
Problem:
Teams track bid statuses inconsistently using personal notes, emails, and scattered spreadsheets, creating confusion over what's complete and what remains open.
One head of bids admitted: “We constantly lose track of who’s submitted responses or which bid version is most current.”
Consequence:
Delayed or incomplete submissions, duplicated efforts, and missed opportunities.
Fix:
Implement a centralized, real-time bid-tracking dashboard accessible by all stakeholders, clearly indicating status, responsibility, and deadlines.
Mistake 4: Recreating standard bid content repeatedly
Problem:
Teams frequently rewrite similar candidate profiles, company credentials, compliance details, and project case studies - even when identical content was previously approved and successful.
A senior bid writer noted: “We waste valuable hours rewriting standard proposal sections because past versions aren't accessible.”
Consequence:
Inefficiency, inconsistent messaging, lost productivity, and reduced capacity for strategic proposal work.
Fix:
Develop a searchable content library to quickly reuse proven candidate bios, company credentials, compliance standards, and success stories.
Mistake 5: Slow, unclear bid approval processes
Problem:
Approval workflows rely heavily on cumbersome email threads involving multiple stakeholders (sales, compliance, pricing, legal, and recruitment teams).
A proposal coordinator said: “Approval via email is painfully slow, especially as deadlines approach, creating confusion and rushed reviews.”
Consequence:
Delayed submissions, rushed decision-making, missed deadlines, and heightened frustration across teams.
Fix:
Streamline approvals with clearly defined roles, structured deadlines, and a centralized platform for swift, transparent decision-making.
Mistake 6: Constantly chasing internal contributors
Problem:
Bid managers repeatedly chase recruiters, subject-matter experts, and sales colleagues for essential candidate details, pricing information, or compliance documentation.
A bid leader expressed frustration: “Half our team’s energy is spent following up with busy colleagues instead of focusing on crafting compelling proposals.”
Consequence:
Employee burnout, reduced bid quality, stalled strategic initiatives, and lower overall team productivity.
Fix:
Automate reminder follow-ups, set clear internal deadlines, and maintain contingency plans for critical bid information.
Mistake 7: Guessing which bids to pursue without analytics
Problem:
Staffing firms often rely on intuition or past experiences, rather than data, to choose bids—leading to wasted resources on unlikely-to-win opportunities.
A commercial director remarked: “Without clear analytics, we frequently chase tenders that drain resources without providing meaningful returns.”
Consequence:
Lower win rates, wasted effort, frustration, and missed opportunities to target better-aligned, profitable contracts.
Fix:
Use bid analytics and historical data insights to prioritize opportunities that best align with your strengths and past successes.
Mistake 8: Manually comparing complex bid information
Problem:
Teams manually evaluate and compare candidate profiles, pricing options, and detailed supplier submissions across multiple formats (spreadsheets, PDFs, documents).
A bid analyst shared: “Manual bid comparisons are tedious, error-prone, and slow, often taking days for complex submissions.”
Consequence:
Costly pricing errors, overlooked compliance issues, and inefficient decision-making processes.
Fix:
Standardize bid comparison templates and adopt software that instantly identifies differences, ensuring rapid and accurate decisions.
The bottom line
Staffing and recruitment firms relying on fragmented and manual bid processes sacrifice productivity, profitability, and strategic focus. Firms that standardize and centralize their bid management systems reduce errors and speed up cycles by over 35%—resulting in significantly improved win rates.
Ready to eliminate inefficiencies and consistently secure strategic staffing contracts? Book your Altura demo today.
.png)
.avif)
